Capabilities
Industries
Quality & Engineering
Resources
About
Learning Center

Custom Gasket Manufacturing: Comparing Gasket Cutting vs. Form-in-Place vs. Extrusions

September 15, 2025

Custom Gasket Manufacturing: Comparing Gasket Cutting vs. Form-in-Place vs. Extrusions
Manufactured with Speed and Precision

The manufacturing capabilities you need and the engineering support you want, all from a single partner.

Submit a Design

Key Points

  • Manufacturing method selection impacts everything from initial tooling costs to long-term assembly efficiency and product reliability in custom gasket manufacturing
  • Gasket cutting methods excel for high-volume production and simple geometries, offering the lowest per-part costs once tooling is amortized across production runs
  • Form-in-place (FIP) gaskets provide superior precision for complex paths and eliminate assembly labor, making them ideal for intricate designs where manual installation would be challenging
  • Extrusions offer the best reworkability for systems requiring repeated opening and resealing, with easy field replacement capabilities for maintenance applications
  • Total cost analysis must include tooling, material waste, assembly labor, and lifecycle maintenance — not just initial material costs in custom gasket manufacturing decisions
  • Design complexity often drives the decision, with highly intricate gasket paths favoring FIP dispensing while simple geometries suit cutting or extrusion methods

Engineers designing sealed enclosures face a fundamental choice in custom gasket manufacturing that impacts everything from prototype costs to production scalability. The decision between gasket cutting, form-in-place dispensing, and extrusions determines not just the gasket itself, but the entire assembly process downstream.

Each approach offers distinct advantages that align with specific design requirements and production volumes. Understanding these trade-offs early in the design process prevents costly redesigns and ensures optimal performance in the field.

Understanding the Three Custom Gasket Manufacturing Approaches

Modern custom gasket manufacturing encompasses three primary methodologies, each with unique capabilities and applications. These approaches represent different philosophies toward solving sealing challenges in engineered systems.

1. Traditional Gasket Cutting

Gasket cutting transforms raw elastomeric materials into precise shapes using controlled removal processes.

  • Die cutting uses sharp metal dies to punch through materials in single strokes, excelling at high-volume production of simple shapes with exceptional speed and consistency once tooling is established.
  • Waterjet cutting employs high-pressure water streams with abrasive particles to cut complex geometries without hard tooling requirements, making it ideal for prototypes and low-volume production.
  • CNC knife cutting uses computer-controlled blades for precise cuts with excellent dimensional accuracy and design flexibility without new tooling investments.

2. Form-in-Place Gasket Dispensing

Form-in-place (FIP) gasket dispensing creates gaskets by applying liquid elastomeric materials directly onto housing surfaces. The material cures in place, creating a gasket that perfectly conforms to the substrate geometry and surface imperfections.

This method eliminates the gap between gasket manufacturing and installation. The dispensing process uses CNC machines to follow precise paths, creating gaskets with complex geometries that would be nearly impossible to achieve through cutting methods.

3. Extruded Gaskets

Extrusion manufacturing creates continuous gasket profiles by forcing elastomeric materials through shaped dies. The resulting profiles are then cut to length and joined to form closed gasket systems.

Extrusions offer consistent cross-sectional profiles and can incorporate complex internal geometries like hollow sections or multiple sealing surfaces. The continuous manufacturing process makes them cost-effective for applications requiring substantial linear footage.

New call-to-action

Read our Custom Gasket Production Guide.

Technical Comparison: Custom Gasket Manufacturing Methods

Characteristic

Die Cutting

Waterjet/CNC Cutting

Form-in-Place

Extrusions

Standard Tolerance

±0.015" (±0.38 mm) for solid materials

±0.010" (±0.25 mm) typical

±0.006" (±0.15 mm)

±0.010" (±0.25 mm) cross-section

Minimum Feature Size

0.030" (0.76 mm)

0.005" (0.13 mm)

0.020" (0.51 mm) width

Limited by die design

Tooling Requirements

Hard tooling required

Soft tooling/programming

Programming only

Extrusion die required

Setup Costs

High for complex shapes

Low to moderate

Low

Moderate to high

Material Waste

15-40% typical

5-15% typical

Minimal

Minimal

Volume Economics

Excellent for high volume

Good for low-medium volume

Volume independent

Good for continuous profiles

Geometric Complexity

Limited by die design

Excellent 2D capability

Excellent 3D following

Limited to uniform cross-section

The tolerance capabilities shown represent standard manufacturing parameters in custom gasket manufacturing. Tighter tolerances are achievable through specialized engineering approaches, though this increases both lead times and costs significantly.

Design Considerations for Each Custom Gasket Manufacturing Method

Material selection plays a crucial role in determining the optimal custom gasket manufacturing approach. Different elastomeric materials respond differently to various manufacturing processes, affecting both feasibility and final performance.

Durometer hardness significantly impacts manufacturing method selection, with harder materials suiting cutting methods better while softer materials may compress during cutting operations. Cellular structure presents particular challenges, as foam materials tend to tear during cutting and show dimensional variations due to their inherent structure.

Chemical compatibility requirements for environmental exposure may limit material options for specific manufacturing methods, while thermal properties and temperature cycling demands affect both material selection and processing parameters.

FIP gasket materials are specifically formulated for dispensing applications. These materials must maintain proper viscosity during dispensing while providing excellent adhesion to substrate materials. The curing process creates strong bonds that eliminate concerns about gasket displacement during assembly or service.

Environmental requirements significantly impact material selection and manufacturing method choice. Applications requiring resistance to specific chemicals, temperature extremes, or UV exposure may limit material options and favor certain manufacturing approaches.

Geometric complexity represents one of the most important factors in custom gasket manufacturing method selection. Simple rectangular or circular gaskets suit any manufacturing method, while complex 2D paths favor CNC waterjet cutting for intricate flat patterns. FIP dispensing excels at following complex housing surfaces and 3D contours, though sharp corners may present challenges. Undercuts or recesses limit most manufacturing approaches and typically require design modifications to achieve optimal results.

New call-to-action

Visit the Design for Manufacturability Resource Center.

When to Choose Each Custom Gasket Manufacturing Approach

High Volume Production

High-volume production with simple geometries favors die cutting approaches in custom gasket manufacturing. Once tooling costs are amortized across sufficient quantities, die cutting provides the lowest per-part costs and fastest production rates.

Die cutting applications typically include monthly volumes exceeding 1,000 pieces that justify tooling investments through cost amortization. Automotive applications prioritize cost optimization for competitive positioning, while consumer electronics require consistent quality across high production volumes. Appliance manufacturing benefits from fast production rates and material efficiency that die cutting provides.

Rapid Prototyping

Prototype and low-volume production benefits from cutting methods that eliminate hard tooling requirements in custom gasket manufacturing. Waterjet and CNC knife cutting allow rapid iteration without significant upfront investments. Design validation phases requiring multiple iterations favor these approaches, as do specialty equipment applications with limited production runs but demanding performance requirements. Research and development projects where design flexibility outweighs per-part cost considerations, and custom solutions tailored to specific requirements, also benefit from flexible cutting methods.

Gasket Complexity

Complex gasket paths with intricate geometries strongly favor FIP dispensing approaches in custom gasket manufacturing. When gasket installation would require significant manual labor or specialized assembly fixtures, FIP dispensing often provides overall cost advantages.

FIP applications excel in telecommunications enclosures requiring EMI shielding around multiple internal compartments, medical device housings with complex sealing paths that resist manual gasket installation, aerospace assemblies demanding precision sealing in confined spaces, and defense electronics where assembly complexity reduction improves reliability and reduces costs.

Gasket Reworkability

Reworkability requirements make extrusions attractive for maintenance-intensive applications in custom gasket manufacturing. Systems requiring periodic opening for service or repair benefit from gaskets that can be easily replaced without specialized equipment.

Field-serviceable equipment requiring gasket replacement with standard tools, maintenance-intensive systems where gasket replacement is routine, long-life applications where replacement ease matters more than initial installation quality, and remote installations where specialized FIP dispensing equipment is unavailable all favor extrusion approaches.

Quality and Performance Factors in Custom Gasket Manufacturing

Sealing performance varies among custom gasket manufacturing methods due to different material properties and installation approaches. Cut gaskets rely on compression to fill surface irregularities, while FIP gaskets conform molecularly to substrate surfaces.

Surface conformability gives FIP gaskets advantages as they flow into microscopic variations for superior sealing, while cut gaskets provide uniform stress distribution across sealing surfaces. Installation precision eliminates human error in gasket placement when using FIP methods, though material homogeneity may be affected in cutting methods where filler distribution can be disrupted near cut edges.

EMI shielding effectiveness depends heavily on gasket material and installation quality in custom gasket manufacturing applications. Conductive fillers in elastomeric matrices provide electromagnetic interference protection, but manufacturing methods affect filler distribution and contact integrity.

  • Filler distribution uniformity: FIP maintains consistent distribution throughout dispensed material
  • Contact integrity: Installation method affects electrical connection quality with mating surfaces
  • Dimensional consistency: Affects shielding effectiveness across the entire gasket perimeter
  • Long-term stability: Manufacturing method influences filler migration and performance degradation

Long-term reliability considerations include compression set resistance, material degradation, and adhesion stability. Different custom gasket manufacturing methods create different stress patterns and material orientations that affect service life.

Manufacturing Excellence at Modus Advanced

Engineers partnering with Modus Advanced gain access to comprehensive custom gasket manufacturing capabilities spanning all three primary approaches. Our vertically integrated facility eliminates the complexity of coordinating multiple suppliers while ensuring consistent quality standards across all processes.

Our engineering team — representing over 10% of our staff — provides design for manufacturability guidance that optimizes gasket performance while minimizing production costs. This expertise proves particularly valuable when evaluating trade-offs between different custom gasket manufacturing approaches.

Precision cutting capabilities include die cutting for high-volume production, waterjet cutting for complex geometries, and CNC knife cutting for prototype development. Our material expertise spans thousands of elastomeric compounds for optimal application matching, while tolerance capabilities achieve standard ±0.015" (±0.38 mm) for solid materials with tighter tolerances available when required. Quality assurance includes dimensional verification and material property testing for every production run, supported by engineering guidance to improve manufacturability while maintaining performance.

Form-in-place dispensing expertise encompasses conductive and non-conductive materials from leading suppliers including Nolato, Parker Chomerics, and Laird. Our dispensing capabilities achieve ±0.006" (±0.15 mm) standard dispensing tolerances with 3D dispensing capability for intricate housing geometries. Material validation includes electrical testing for EMI shielding applications and adhesion verification, while process optimization develops curing parameters for maximum performance and reliability.

AS9100 and ISO 9001 certifications demonstrate our commitment to quality management systems that support critical applications in aerospace, defense, and medical device industries. ITAR compliance enables support for sensitive defense applications requiring security clearances.

Optimizing Your Custom Gasket Manufacturing Strategy

The choice between gasket cutting, form-in-place dispensing, and extrusions in custom gasket manufacturing requires careful analysis of design requirements, production volumes, and lifecycle costs. No single approach optimally serves all applications, making engineering expertise essential for optimal selection.

Consider engaging manufacturing partners early in the design process to evaluate trade-offs between different approaches. Design modifications that improve manufacturability often reduce costs while enhancing performance, creating win-win scenarios for development programs.

At Modus Advanced, we believe one day matters when your innovations could save lives or protect critical systems. Our comprehensive custom gasket manufacturing capabilities, combined with our engineering expertise and quality focus, help accelerate your path from design to production.

Whether your application demands the precision of FIP dispensing, the economics of die cutting, or the reworkability of extrusions, our team stands ready to deliver the manufacturing excellence your critical applications require.

New call-to-action